[Foundation-l] GFDL 1.3 Release

[psychoslave at culture-libre.org]

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:49 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2)It's taken years to get the FSF to agree to let us get around one
>> set of compatibility problems. Switching to FAL means we may end up in
>> the same situation with a different organisation
>>
>
> Not to mention the uncertainty that arises from the lack of an
> aggregration clause in the FAL.
>
>
> Bryan

What do you mean by "aggregration clause", I fail to understand ? Could
you tell it with other words, please ?