[Foundation-l] Global rollback users

[White Cat]

I proposed something similar too. Tiny/Inactive wikis need special
attention. Larger ones do not need such an attention. Stweards should be
able to grant global statuses with the ability of giving exceptions.

   - White Cat

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is kind of the system I think would be best - privelages at all
> Wikis *under* a certain size, or all Wikis without active admins. I
> don't know if this is possible.
>
> Mark
>
> 2008/5/29 Yaroslav M. Blanter <putevod at mccme.ru>:
> >> Delete/undelete rights are not a bid deal. There are persons at
> >> developed projects which take care about deleting and undeleting
> >> pages. The rule added for covering this issue may be very simple:
> >> using those rights at projects with regularly active administrators
> >> will be sanctioned by removing rights immediately. I think that it is
> >> fair enough and that every reasonable Wikimedian may agree with such
> >> rules.
> >>
> >
> > How would you determine whether the wp in question has active admins? For
> > instance, does tt.wp has active admins? I am not sure I would like to
> have
> > my rights removed for rolling vandal edits back on one of the projects I
> > did not see any admin edits for 30 days and then it turns out that I just
> > did not notice smth. We are obviously not talking of large projects like
> > en.wp or fr.wp., but of smth below 10K pages.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Yaroslav
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>