[Foundation-l] Dealing with interwiki disruption
Geoffrey Plourde
geo.plrd at yahoo.com
Sun May 11 01:00:09 UTC 2008
This actually sounds like a good idea. Keeps Willy on Wheels from becoming Guillermo en Carro.
----- Original Message ----
From: Christiano Moreschi <moreschiwikiman at hotmail.co.uk>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 1:47:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Dealing with interwiki disruption
Apologies if this has already been proposed - I haven't read all the thread - but what would be really helpful is a noticeboard on meta for admins and trusted users from all projects to confer about users whose disruptive activities span multiple projects. Such a thing may exist already, but if so it doesn't seem to have been very widely publicised.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
> Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 11:18:44 -0700
> From: saintonge at telus.net
> To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Dealing with interwiki disruption
>
> White Cat wrote:
> > You realize what you are saying is the opposite of what you mean right?
> >
> Quite the contrary. While I'm not a great supporter of global blocking
> in the first place, it is clear that Brian understands the problems.
> Your excess of enthusiasm for the proposal suggests that with friends
> like you the proposal needs no enemies
> > The local community should decide weather or not to give a second chance to
> > the disruptive user. Such a decision should not be made bu the disruptive
> > user.
> >
> We are not talking about "second" chances but first chances. Assuming
> good faith includes treating a project newbie on the basis of what he
> does in a project, not on the basis of his being on somebody's prejudice
> list. As Birgitte has stated, Wikisource regulars are quite capable of
> recognizing a disruptive users when they come along. I assure you that
> those who seek to impose their personal POVs about the rules or import
> some other project's robotic solutions are far more disruptive than
> vandals, spammers and trolls.
> > When a disruptive user blocked on some other wiki starts editing another
> > wiki. Consider a user indef banned from en.wikiquote starts to edit
> > en.wikisource... The local community should know exactly who they are
> > dealing with.
> > -- White Cat
> >
> The local community knows exactly what he is doing by reading his posts
> in that community's project. If Wikiquote found some reason to ban the
> user there, that is entirely their business.
>
> Ec
_________________________________________________________________
Win Indiana Jones prizes with Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl0010000002ukm/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list