[Foundation-l] privacy policy update
effe iets anders
effeietsanders at gmail.com
Fri May 9 18:24:12 UTC 2008
Just to clear things out, although I think I know the answer, what
about regular users' request to arbcoms etc? Are checkusers going to
be obliged to disclose that too? Or only if the request is made to the
*foundation*? (I think it is the latter, but please confirm :) )
BR, Lodewijk
2008/5/9, Nathan <nawrich op gmail.com>:
> A more specific question than what White Cat wrote below would be this: In
> what situations does the WMF disclose information? Only as the result of a
> subpoena? In response to a national security letter? To a non-binding
> request from law enforcement (assuming that, in some locales, a request
> other than a subpoena may be binding)?
>
> I would assume that a request from a private lawyer for information relevant
> to litigation which has not resulted in a subpoena valid in the United
> States would not be honored? Somewhat relevant to me personally, as a
> matter of fact, as I have reason to expect such a request for my
> information.
>
> Nathan
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:30 AM, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko op gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> > I am kind of concerned (not with the change btw). Basically if I wanted to
> > learn the IP of a user I dislike, all I need to do is file a criminal
> > charge? How does it work?
> > - White Cat
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l op lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list