[Foundation-l] Dealing with interwiki disruption
White Cat
wikipedia.kawaii.neko at gmail.com
Thu May 8 14:55:05 UTC 2008
1) This is not about the Jack Merridew case. I have got a lot to say about
that but I wont as that isn't the scope of this. I have been observing
difficulties on interwiki related issues for quite some time. Assuming good
faith towards me isn't banned, keep that in mind.
2) Do not quote me without permission. Publishing IRC logs publicaly may get
you banned from all Wikimedia channels - or so it says when you join
channels. Frankly it is very rude.
- White Cat
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Aphaia <aphaia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for your information but it doesn't sound an "interwiki" thing
> > at all. It sounds rather trwiki internal issue and that's all.
> >
> > And I would add using stewards as deus ex machina to judge community
> > issues is a horrible idea, at least for me. Trwiki, in this case,
> > would be better to settle their own arbcom; again it doesn't look like
> > "interwiki" things.
>
> I want to remember that this thread started because White Cat wanted
> Jack Merridew blocked *by stewards* in projects where he edited and
> without obvious (according to several of us who looked) disruption
>
> In his words:
> >> Consider the scenario where a disruptive user is indefinitely blocked on
> a
> >> particular wiki. He decides to have a "fresh start" in causing the same
> >> slow-paced disruption on all sister projects one by one...
>
> Yes, someone else pointed that trouble users will eventually prove
> themselves and get blocked, that's true, nothing new is needed.
>
> Now what is being proposed is a board to track "trouble users" who are
> not obvious vandals (like those who checkusers track crosswiki), and
> block them so they can't "escape to Mexico to commit more murders" but
> just "controversial users". It sounds a bit to me like stalking
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list