[Foundation-l] Dealing with interwiki disruption

[Pedro Sanchez]

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Aphaia <aphaia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your information but it doesn't sound an "interwiki" thing
>  at all. It sounds rather trwiki internal issue and that's all.
>
>  And I would add using stewards as deus ex machina to judge community
>  issues is a horrible idea, at least for me. Trwiki, in this case,
>  would be better to settle their own arbcom; again it doesn't look like
>  "interwiki" things.

I want to remember that this thread started because White Cat wanted
Jack Merridew blocked *by stewards* in projects where he edited and
without obvious (according to several of us who looked) disruption

In his words:
>> Consider the scenario where a disruptive user is indefinitely blocked on a
>> particular wiki. He decides to have a "fresh start" in causing the same
>> slow-paced disruption on all sister projects one by one...

Yes, someone else pointed that trouble users will eventually prove
themselves and get blocked, that's true, nothing new is needed.

Now what is being proposed is a board to track "trouble users" who are
not obvious vandals (like those who checkusers track crosswiki), and
block them so they can't "escape to Mexico to commit more murders" but
just "controversial users". It sounds a bit to me like stalking