[Foundation-l] Chapter-selected Board seats - brainstorming
Dan Rosenthal
swatjester at gmail.com
Sat May 3 17:13:21 UTC 2008
On the contrary, I think that the issue of how chapters are structured
between states and countries is a critical issue.
-Dan
On May 3, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Sebastian Moleski wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hm. It is a wrong way for arguing for state-level chapters in USA.
>> Free State Bavaria is, for example, much more independent entity than
>> any of US states. And there are a number of similar examples in
>> Europe.
>>
>
> Could we please remain within the scope of the question here, namely
> on what
> basis to structure chapters and what factors influence that? The
> intricate
> (quite political) details of what level of sovereignty a country,
> state,
> province, or whatever has hold little to no relevance for this
> question.
>
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list