[Foundation-l] Ads and monobook
Florence Devouard
Anthere9 at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 20 17:53:41 UTC 2008
Chad wrote:
> Let's assume projects can opt-out, and this must be approved
> by the Board (as they are ultimately responsible for fiscal
> matters). For the sake of arguments, let's pretend enwiki came
> to a fairly clear consensus that they wished to opt-out of WMF
> ads. Wouldn't this basically kill the entire ads cash-cow right
> there?
>
> Now, continuing this scenario, I can imagine the Board would
> probably reject an opt-out from the largest project. This begs
> the question: does the Foundation see all projects in an
> equal light?
>
> -Chad
That's an excellent question !
I am tempted to return it back first.
If all the languages were voting independently from one another, for
opt-in or opt-out... how would you feel if en.wiki would vote for "no
ads", whilst ja.wiki vote for "yes" ?
Would you rather consider the global project, or would you be willing to
accept diversity ? Should it be a global decision, or a local one ?
I guess that a global decision would make the issue a "core principle"
whilst a local decision would make the advertisement issue a "mild
principle".
ant
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list