[Foundation-l] Fundraising "Bugging for Dollars"
Screamer
scream at datascreamer.com
Thu Mar 20 17:24:01 UTC 2008
This seems very reasonable. One can make restricted donations for a
purpose only. And it can be made known, that such a donation is for the
restricted purpose of equipment purchase and upkeep, bandwidth, and or
network staff.
./scream
Chad wrote:
> I wouldn't necessarily say that it should be auction style. Rather,
> make it $1/vote for bugs, and the bugs that have the highest votes
> (excluding configuration changes and other minor things) would get
> priority. I would say that the money donated to this should be
> earmarked as for tech purposes only, just to keep the money focused
> on the reason it was donated.
>
> Perhaps this "fund" could be used to provide assistance (a contractor?)
> or other such things that require additional resources above and beyond
> the day-to-day bugfixing and such.
>
> Just some thoughts. I would love to hear Brion's or Domas' opinions.
>
> -Chad
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Screamer <scream at datascreamer.com> wrote:
>
>> Nathan wrote:
>> > I'm sure they weren't serious - if something is a valid bug... It should be
>> > fixed without regard to whether folks decide to pay to get it fixed. Feature
>> > requests should be implemented as they can be, based on factors completely
>> > unrelated to whether some folks want it enough to pay for it. That should
>> > pretty clear, if you think about it.
>> >
>> > Nathan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Geoffrey Plourde <geo.plrd at yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> better idea than ads! I have a feeling that single logon would skyrocket
>> >> to the top of the list.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----
>> >> From: Screamer <scream at datascreamer.com>
>> >> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:51:33 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising "Bugging for Dollars"
>> >>
>> >> Screamer wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I don't think they were serious, but this sounds like a fine idea.
>> >>> Reposted with permission. From #wikimedia-tech:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [21:43] <kylu> actually, you should change bugzilla... instead of
>> >>> voting for bugs, you donate for them
>> >>> [21:43] <AaronSchulz> and it builds up like a pot, that they get if
>> >>> they implement it
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually, I think this is a grand idea. Bugging for dollars. What
>> >>> are the thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ./scream
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> To clarify, the proceeds go to the foundation. :)
>> >>
>> >> ./scream
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> foundation-l mailing list
>> >> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> >> Be a better friend, newshound, and
>> >> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>> >> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> foundation-l mailing list
>> >> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > foundation-l mailing list
>> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >
>> Well of course, bugs get coded, no matter what. Feature requests, can
>> be coded at normal priority. But, the foundation can hold an auction
>> everyweek, and the bug to win, gets the highest priority. Nothing wrong
>> with that. Nothing at all.
>>
>>
>> Everything "should" be done this way or that way does not seem to hold
>> here. Everything can be done however the foundation wants to do it. I
>> don't see why the foundation can not take a seriously look, at this
>> proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ./scream
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list