[Foundation-l] Board vote, need a bit of help

[phoebe ayers]

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Philippe Beaudette
<philippebeaudette at gmail.com> wrote:
> Harel appropriately answers your questions, Delphine.  The only thing that I
> would clarify is that the system does, indeed, rank "unranked" candidates
> with a 100 - they are assumed to be the least favored.
>
> To be clear: you may rank as many candidates as you want with a 1, whether
> that's three candidates or one candidate.  Your rankings do not need to be
> numerically ordered (you don't need to do 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.... you can do 1,
> 15, 27, 32, and unranked, if you want).
>
> Philippe

But 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 1, 15, 27, 32, unranked are equivalent as far as
the voting software is concerned? I didn't understand this part
either.

I might have to revote :)
-- phoebe