[Foundation-l] Knol: on the bright side of things...

Ilario Valdelli valdelli at gmail.com
Wed Jul 30 08:11:57 UTC 2008

I fully agree and we *must* understand that any article is a collaborative work.

If one editor doesn't license it's contribution in CC-BY the whole
article cannot be licensed in CC-BY.

And what about IP contributions? Can the CC-BY be assigned to an IP?


On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Massimiliano <m.lincetto at gmail.com> wrote:
> I still don't understand why we should reject the copyleft philosophy and
> change to an attribution  license. I think that our mission is not only to
> provide free information and knowledge, but also to be sure that it will be
> kept free.
> I don't think that we should change our licensing policies in order to be
> published on Google Knol: why we should do it? If Knols wants to allow its
> users to publish Wikipedia-derivative content they should change their
> terms, IMHO.
> Massimiliano
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

More information about the foundation-l mailing list