[Foundation-l] thoughts on leakages

[Jussi-Ville Heiskanen]

On 1/11/08, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> There is an important difference between a person who walks away in a huff
> as an employee and then decides to stand for board election and a person
> that changes one role for another. The difference is that in the one
> situation I do not expect positive cooperation and in the other I do not see
> such such a problem. From my perspective Danny was not forthcoming in
> explaining why he left his job. I have asked him repeatedly for this from
> the moment when he announced that he would run for a seat on the board of
> trustees.
>
> I opposed Danny's candidacy from the moment he announced his wish to be a
> candidate. This was before the moment people could make themselves available
> as such. The notion that people would object to accepting someone on the
> board that was voted in is an option that is open to the board. It will
> upset some people but this is to be weighed against the harm that is
> expected of an unwelcome elected board member.

Just out of curiosity... Did you ever feel it might have been useful
for Erik to publicly
tell the world at large precisely why he left the role of CRO?

I recall Erik making a grandiloquent stament about how he felt he and
Jimbo could
not live together in a house, because their egos supposedly were too large.

I infact have yet to see any evidence that Eriks evaluation of Jimbos
ego was correct.

I freely admit this query is only for my own curiosity.

--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]