[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)
Thomas Dalton
thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 15:54:09 UTC 2008
On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton,
> > Communication involving the parties would need to be translated,
>
> Of course.
> What I am saying is that people participate in any language
> and then somebody translate it to a common (major) language
> chosen for the case if there is need.
>
> In my proposal you see the arguments in both the source language
> and a major language.
The arguments from the parties, yes. I'm talking about discussion
within the committee. Once they've heard the arguments they need to
deliberate and reach a conclusion - that deliberation needs to happen
in one language or it's simply impractical.
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list