[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[hillgentleman]

Thomas Dalton,
> Communication involving the parties would need to be translated,

Of course.
What I am saying is that people  participate in any language
and then somebody translate it to a common (major) language
chosen for the case if there is need.

In my proposal you see the arguments in both the source language
and a major language.

Best,
H.

On 05/01/2008, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yaroslav M. Blanter,
> > The problem is not in the committee member but in the community member.
> > That is, requiring participant  to use English alone automatically eliminate
> > many participants in a case  in their own language project.
> >
> > Remember, the arbitration committee is a service.  Customers are always right.
>
> Communication involving the parties would need to be translated,
> there's no choice there. I'm talking about discussions within the
> committee.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>