[Foundation-l] [WikiEN-l] Legal obligation to report Wikipedia editor under UCMJ (Mike G weigh in?)

[Nathan]

OM quoted it I think to MastCell, its mentioned on OM's talk page
(link I provided initially).

On Jan 2, 2008 3:43 PM, Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone mentioned what portion of the UCMJ this is under? At least
> reading it might give us a better idea instead of shooting in the
> dark.
>
> Chad
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 3:38 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we're getting a little off topic here, and I think its an
> > issue that is important enough that we should stay focused on the
> > issues of key importance. Do we have a legal obligation (probably no,
> > IMHO, but IANAL), is there a policy conflict in this area, is the
> > obligation purported by these editors a fact? I think non-lawyers can
> > probably review the second issue, but one and three require legal
> > assistance in my opinion.
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>