[Foundation-l] [WikiEN-l] Legal obligation to report Wikipedia editor under UCMJ (Mike G weigh in?)

[Chad]

Has anyone mentioned what portion of the UCMJ this is under? At least
reading it might give us a better idea instead of shooting in the
dark.

Chad

On Jan 2, 2008 3:38 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we're getting a little off topic here, and I think its an
> issue that is important enough that we should stay focused on the
> issues of key importance. Do we have a legal obligation (probably no,
> IMHO, but IANAL), is there a policy conflict in this area, is the
> obligation purported by these editors a fact? I think non-lawyers can
> probably review the second issue, but one and three require legal
> assistance in my opinion.
>
> Nathan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>