[Foundation-l] Wiki work
Chad
innocentkiller at gmail.com
Wed Feb 27 07:13:59 UTC 2008
Exactly. I've been managing our multiple-wiki install at my
employer for almost a year now. Several departments are
using them as an "internal whiteboard" if you will. I actually
was looking at a job recently that would've titled me as
a "Wiki Technology Consultant." I think this definitely
shows that wikis have a place in the corporate world and
the "Enterprise-ready" MediaWiki is just waiting on a
company to basically market the product, as Tim said.
-Chad
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Tim Starling <tstarling at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Dirk Riehle wrote:
> > Confluence is "enterprise ready" i.e. has a lot of features that
> > MediaWiki doesn't have and that the public Internet community
> > typically doesn't care about.
> >
> > Confluence is based on an open source wiki engine, www.snipsnap.org,
> > which unfortunately is stalling. (But is still one of the best engines
> > out there IMO.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dirk
>
> "Enterprise ready" is just a marketing term. It doesn't actually say
> anything about what features it has and what features it doesn't have, and
> lots of enterprises are using MediaWiki out of the box.
>
> Which brings me to one big thing that Confluence has but MediaWiki
> doesn't: a marketing team. Add to that a sales team and professional
> support services, and you have a convincing case for any corporate executive.
>
> MediaWiki really needs very little development work done in order to take
> over the corporate world. But there is no support organisation to pay for
> it, so it doesn't get done. With commercial support funding development,
> MediaWiki could easily become the MySQL of wiki engines.
>
> -- Tim Starling
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list