[Foundation-l] Sexual images of questionable provenance

[Robert Rohde]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>

> LonelygirlUk.
> "Oh yes, Thats me— I consent to being naked on the internet"
>
> We're kind screwed with respect to your hypothetical, but we should
> still do due diligence.
>
<snip>

Of course, the LonelygirlUK images were eventually (significantly
after the fact) identified as belonging to a particular pornstar.  So
while they were copyvios (unless the pornstar was actually the
uploader?!) they probably can't be said to have caused any harm to
woman in question.

-Robert Rohde