[Foundation-l] Sexual images of questionable provenance

[Ting Chen]

Actually I don't care if the image has sexual content or not. There are 
some points we should consider:

At first I don't trust all the claims on flickr.
Second there may be content that violate personality or other legal issues.

Some of the images were uploaded years ago and at that time we had other 
measurement criterias as today, so I think a reexamination should be 
done, this totally unrelated to the content of the images.

Ting

Waerth wrote:
> Oh boy in comes the political correctness brigade .....
>
>
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe that we have a lot of images from flickr with sexual
>> content. And there is no way to make sure that the (Fe)male on the
>> photo agrees with the photo on commons or the licence it is under.
>>
>> I have tryed to nominate images like that for deletion. I can say all
>> image are kept. The main reasson was the image is free so we can have
>> it.
>>
>> I believe that image with sexual content have to be checked... Do we
>> need it... Is it really free.... Isn't there a other option than a
>> image.
>>
>> We have more than one category with nude male or female images and
>> most of them are not in use on any project. I don't think we need the
>> images with very young people on it.
>>
>> Huib
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>