[Foundation-l] Note regarding status of privacy policy (suggestion)

[scream at datascreamer.com]

> hmmm.... can't quite agree with you, Jussi.
>
> I share some of Slim's concerns on this one, though I write more as a
> reprobate whose multiple accounts were detected late last year - also the
> comparison with the animal rights movement's attempts to decentralise made
> sense to me - it seemed like an apt analogy.
>
> Does it really matter if people are checkusered regularly, with a
> liberally
> low bar, and the information garnered from such checks is shared between
> friends and colleagues equally liberally?
>
> Maybe, maybe not - but I think that's kinda the status quo, and I think
> people deserve the right to question it without being poo pooed -
> especially
> when it's not really reflected by what's written on the tin at the policy
> pages.
>
> On the other hand - I see this thread's purpose was intended to be a
> review
> of the new draft of the privacy policy. I think it's an improvement - I
> think the key issues relate to the ways it's implemented - I would like to
> assume for example that some rigour is applied to the assessment of
> external
> legal claims before IP data is handed over.
>
> best,
>
> Peter
> PM.

Speaking of the privacy policy... I think I would like to see the data
retention to something along the lines of fifteen days or so.

Jon

I'll pgp sign this later if requested.