[Foundation-l] Confidentiality agreement with FSF

[Thomas Dalton]

On 15/04/2008, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>  >> There are many reasons for people to respect the confidentiality of
>  >>  discussions other than being forced to by an NDA.  I consider this to be
>  >>  so blindingly obvious that my mind was boggling as to what you could
>  >>  possibly have meant.
>  >>
>  > People that aren't working for an organisation that's supposed to be
>  > as transparent as possible, sure. That's not the case here. The WMF
>  > should not be keeping anything from the community unless they
>  > absolutely have to.
>
> I'm getting the impression that you are mixing up your controversies
>  between Erik's Non-Disclosure of FDL 1.3 proceedings, and the
>  Non-Disparagement aspects of the last Board meeting report.

That would be a false impression. I haven't even been thinking about
the non-disparagement discussion. They are related issues, but they
are clearly separate.