[Foundation-l] Criteria for the closure of projects.

[Mark Williamson]

So what you are saying is that the language committee is ruled by
which people can or cannot agree with Gerard, and members must all
agree with him or it will not function properly? That's a bit extreme,
I think. Isn't it?

Mark

On 14/04/2008, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/4/11, Jesse Martin (Pathoschild) <pathoschild at gmail.com>:
>
> > Mark Williamson wrote:
>  >  > It seems to me that the language committee formed itself and chose its
>  >  >  own members. Why isn't someone like Andre Engels a member?
>  >
>  >
>  > That's probably because he never asked and nobody nominated him. He
>  >  looks like an good candidate to me.
>
>
> Won't work. The committee works with consensus. The amount of
>  disagreement I have with some of those outcomes makes me believe that
>  no consensus could have been reached had I been a member. Thus, making
>  me a member will most probably lead to no decision for a while because
>  there's too many things Gerard and I cannot agree on, then me leaving
>  the committee angrily and things getting back to as they were before.
>
>
>
>  --
>
> Andre Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
>  ICQ: 6260644  --  Skype: a_engels
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
> foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>