[Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] Primary account for single user login

[\Mike]

--- Anon Sricharoenchai <anon.hui at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 4/9/08, Aphaia <aphaia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Anon
> Sricharoenchai <anon.hui at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  >  There're local sysop that speak same
> language.
> >  >  Local sysop normally do the task of
> suppressing bad faith (including impostor).
> >  >  This doesn't affect normal task.
> >  >  What do you think?
> >
> >
> > I'm afraid you missed the point. There is no
> assurance the "local
> >  sysop" can communicate with the other
> parties in the language the
> >  other know.
> >
> 
> Sorry, that's my mistake.
> 
> Hmm..., I'm trying to figure out your case.
> 
> 1. Mr.A only communicate using fr, while Mr.B
> only using ja, and
> acting as an imposter.
> 2. How can Mr.A know that Mr.B is trying to act
> as Mr.A?  Since Mr. B
> only speak ja, then Mr.A never know if Mr.B is
> acting as Mr.A or not.
> 3. How could Mr.A be impacted from impostor in
> the language that he
> never understand?
> 

For example: if Mr.A sees that Mr.B copies the
design of Mr.A's user page, inter-wiki links to
Mr.A's user page on fr.wp.... 

Also, inability to communicate in a language does
not always mean that one is unable to understand
anything of it: personally I wouldn't attempt to
write more than two consecutive words in Spanish,
though I can make a perhaps
not-entirely-uneducated guess on the rough
meaning of some simple sentences. So no, I don't
think it is unreasonable to assume there may be
cases where someone understands a language well
enough to conclude that a particular user's
behavior is dodgy (in particular if the
impersonator has gone as far as include interwiki
links from the userpage...;)), but still being
unable to express those accusations in the
relevant language.

Just my 2 cent,
\Mike


      ___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference  

http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/