[Foundation-l] Criteria for the closure of projects.
Mark Williamson
node.ue at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 07:46:52 UTC 2008
I have to disagree strongly with the latter two. 1000 articles is too
high a limit, all of the messages is perhaps not too unreasonable to
expect, but it should not ever be a criterium for closing a project.
Mark
On 10/04/2008, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> For quite some time, we have had people arguing for the closure of projects.
> I have seen many arguments pro and against closures. What has been missing
> in all these projects are objective criteria why it makes sense to find
> fault with a project.
>
> I have come up with three objective arguments.
>
> - A project is not what it is advertised to be. For instance when a
> language is always written in a particular script, a project in any other
> script is problematic.
> - A project does not have at least 90% of the most relevant messages
> localised. For your information there are only 498 messages in this category
> at the moment.
> - A project should have at least 1000 articles. When there is nothing
> to see what is the point ?
>
> The first argument is an absolute, never mind the size.
>
> For the second and third I would argue for closure when both conditions are
> not met. When there is activity in either it may be reason for giving an
> ultimatum. The ultimatum would be that both conditions need to be met within
> three months.
>
> The most important reason why we need viable projects is because it is sad
> to see so much time wasted by good people on projects that have little or no
> objective value. No value because nobody actively cares. Yes, people may
> come along and get an interest and eventually they will, but time of
> valuable people is wasted now and that provides in my opinion a really
> strong extra argument.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list