[Foundation-l] Creative Commons CC-BY-SA Draft Statement of Intent
Milos Rancic
millosh at gmail.com
Sun Apr 6 11:03:13 UTC 2008
He is not a lawyer. Being deeply involved and understanding social
processes don't qualify one person to be a lawyer who is able to
analyze possible judicial consequences of one legal act, like license
is.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> Why do you think particularly Erik is an amateur at this? I would say that
> one of the reasons why he was offered the job of deputy director of the WMF
> is because of his efforts in this field. Given that Jimmy is a board member
> of the CC and a board member of the WMF, I would not qualify him as just an
> amateur either.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The whole process was far from transparent and you are continuing with
> > writing rationalizations for keeping the process nontransparent.
> > Changing the license is not only a matter of the Board, but it is a
> > matter of all contributors.
> >
> > I don't remember that I've seen any professional analysis of what we
> > are getting and what we are losing by switching from one to another
> > license. There were only amateur arguing (including your, Erik's,
> > mine, Gregory's, Gerard's...) pro and contra one or another license.
> > (If there was such analysis, please, give me a link.)
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
> > > Milos Rancic wrote:
> > > > May you inform us about at least some of your conclusions (I am
> > > > particularly interested in Mike's conclusions, of course)? Also,
> > while
> > > > I am not perfectly informed about this, I really wouldn't miss the
> > > > information which you said now. So, please, may this process be a
> > > > little bit more transparent?
> > >
> > > I am not sure what I can tell you. What do you want to know?
> > >
> > > It is not possible to tell you blow by blow the state of complex
> > > discussions. It's the hands of lawyers who are working very
> > > thoughtfully about how to deal with complex issues. Discussions have
> > > been going on for years, and things are very close to resolution.
> > >
> > > There was a public comment process, did you take part in it?
> > >
> > > --Jimbo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foundation-l mailing list
> > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list