[Foundation-l] Warrantless (government) surveillance of reader activity. Was: Release of squid log data

[GerardM]

Hoi,
Does that mean that any of the developers will be involved ? I doubt it ..
When they are indeed not involved, how do you get and check your numbers.

PS I am not saying that this might not be a good idea. What I am saying is
that we should not pile more on the existing workload when there is so much
stuff that needs finishing.
Thanks,
    GerardM

On 9/16/07, Austin Hair <adhair at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/16/07, GerardM <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why we should defer it ? Because it would be good to finish things
> first. It
> > is imho really sad that important projects become more time consuming
> > because they are not finished. What to you seems to be not that big a
> deal
> > does cost time and according to earlier remarks it does cost servers.
> Both
> > are in short supply.
>
> Adding these links costs five minutes of non-developer time.  Any wiki
> administrator can do this.
>
> How much additional server capacity is required, and the resulting
> cost-benefit analysis, is what's being discussed.  At any rate, we're
> looking at administrator time, not developer time.
>
> Austin
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>