[Foundation-l] Is fair use a right as well as a defense?

David Gerard dgerard at gmail.com
Mon Sep 10 16:10:04 UTC 2007


On 10/09/2007, Mike Godwin <mgodwin at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> David, for some reason foundation-l doesn't want to accept this
> response from my mgodwin at wikimedia.org address.
>
> ----------------
> This is a great question, precisely because there is a big division
> among copyright theorists on what the answer is.
>
> "Copyright absolutists" like to class "fair use" as merely a defense
> against an infringement claim, because doing so makes it seem narrow
> and exceptional.
>
> Free-speech theorists prefer to class "fair use" as a right that
> derives directly from the First Amendment (or equivalent guarantees
> in other national constitutions or under international treaties).
>
> Personally, I fall into the second camp. It should be noted, however,
> that "fair use" is built into American copyright statutes as,
> technically, a "defense."  Constitutional lawyers like me tend to
> believe this doesn't really answer the philosophical question -- it's
> just a structural choice.
>
>
>
> --Mike Godwin
> General Counsel
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the foundation-l mailing list