[Foundation-l] Unofficial stable version demo

[David Goodman]

reviewed or examined or checked would seem to be the English idiom,
in any case, not sighted, But given the degree of scrutiny, I suppose
we want something much much weaker.

On 10/4/07, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton at btinternet.com> wrote:
> Erik Zachte wrote:
> > A minor point: http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5/Litmus_test now states
> > "sighted for vandalism"
> >
> > I suggest to skip the word vandalism. It may entice even more people to poke
> > some 'fun', or work as an invitation to try even harder.
> > Somewhat like putting a notice on your bicycle "his bicycle is theft proof".
> >
> > Perhaps use 'Current revision, screened"
> >
> > Erik Zachte
>
> Ugh, yes, definitely get rid of that.
>
> And I hope the notice isn't going to appear where it does on that page
> in the final implementation of this... pushing infobox templates 300
> pixels to the right is unacceptable.
>
> -Gurch
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.