geniice at gmail.com
Wed May 9 12:06:11 UTC 2007
On 5/9/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen at gmail.com> wrote:
> The fact that the number itself is a big part of the issue here (as
> evidenced by this conversation, after all?) So, why should we -not-
> print it? It's evident AACS doesn't intend to cause legal trouble,
> they'd make themselves a laughingstock.
We have no frigging idea which way the MPAA is going to jump. While
personaly I might find a situation where they end up owning digg.com
extreamly funny I don't think that would make them a laughing stock.
More information about the foundation-l