[Foundation-l] Rethinking brands

[David Gerard]

On 08/05/07, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:

> The rational one is that many projects feel that they are an
> independent project with its own goals and functions, and not an
> auxiliary project to Wikipedia. Which they would look like under your
> proposal.


And, more importantly, get treated like one by others.

I suggest instead pumping up the Wikimedia name. Wikimedia Commons is
a project with a lot of instantly-useful value for readers - all it
needs for fame is search and tagging that doesn't suck, so the casual
user can find anything!


- d.