[Foundation-l] Why not use Nupedia.com instead? (was Re: A modest proposal: ads on wikipedia.com)

shi zhao shizhao at gmail.com
Sat May 5 17:08:41 UTC 2007

Nupedia similarity Citizendium model?

2007/5/6, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
> On 5/5/07, Daniel Mayer <maveric149 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Not if Wikipedia.org articles direct people there as the official repository of
> > stable/vetted versions.
> I am opposed to the notion that higher accuracy / reliability is an
> added value that people have to pay for with advertising. These should
> be intrinsic properties of Wikipedia itself.
> If anything, we need fewer brands, not more.
> --
> Peace & Love,
> Erik
> DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
> the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
> "An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open,
> free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Chinese wikipedia: http://zh.wikipedia.org/
My blog: http://talk.blogbus.com
CNBlog: http://blog.cnblog.org/weblog.html
Social Brain: http://www.socialbrain.org/default.asp
cnbloggercon: http://www.cnbloggercon.org/


More information about the foundation-l mailing list