[Foundation-l] Why not use Nupedia.com instead? (was Re: A modest proposal: ads on wikipedia.com)

[Erik Moeller]

On 5/5/07, Daniel Mayer <maveric149 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Not if Wikipedia.org articles direct people there as the official repository of
> stable/vetted versions.

I am opposed to the notion that higher accuracy / reliability is an
added value that people have to pay for with advertising. These should
be intrinsic properties of Wikipedia itself.

If anything, we need fewer brands, not more.

-- 
Peace & Love,
Erik

DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.

"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open,
free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic