[Foundation-l] WMF resolution on access to non-public data passed

[Ray Saintonge]

Anthony wrote:

>On 5/1/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>"Did not vote" would be ambiguous.  The proper distinction should be
>>between "abstain" and "absent".  "Absent" in particular states that the
>>person was not there, and could not participate in the vote even if he
>>wanted to.
>>    
>>
>That doesn't seem to be the case, though.  From the description
>provided by Ant, this wasn't a resolution passed by vote during a
>meeting, but rather it was an open-ended consent agreement.  There was
>no "there" to be present or absent from.
>
"There" can be defined by the Foundation.  Perhaps it can be wherever 
the secretary happens to be since it's normally the secretary that keeps 
track of the books and records of the company.

Ec