[Foundation-l] WMF resolution on access to non-public data passed

[David Gerard]

On 02/05/07, Mohamed Magdy <mohamed.m.k at gmail.com> wrote:

> Seriously though, I think Shi was talking about how to make sure that
> whatever information the user is sending are the truth..and that s/he
> isn't forging it somehow...


Fairly obviously, this isn't going to be forgery proof. Its power
would be as an arse-covering measure in case a volunteer with private
info turns evil or crazy. That is, the Foundation has the identity
info supplied by the volunteer, and if they lied then the volunteer is
the liar.


- d.