[Foundation-l] Wikibooks NL is changing License

[Bryan Tong Minh]

I think you are misunderstanding the license, or we are
misunderstanding each other. The GFDL applies to the licensee, not to
the copyright holder. I don;t know whether you see multi licensing as
the problem or something else?

Bryan

On 3/22/07, Jeff V. Merkey <jmerkey at wolfmountaingroup.com> wrote:
> Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
>
> >It is not that complicated. You simply cannot sublicense your derivate
> >work under the cc-by-sa. In case you edit a GFDL only document, your
> >contributions are solely under the GFDL.
> >
> >Bryan
> >
> >
> >
> As I said, I think this scheme voids the GFDL -- at least based upon the
> plain language
> of the GFDL license. It says clearly that sublicensing is prohibiting.
> Copyright holder or not, the
> GFDL is a binding contract if you choose to accept it. At least that's
> my read of the plain
> language of the license. Other folks may have another interpretation though.
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>