[Foundation-l] [WikiEN-l] Accountability: bringing back a proposal I made nearly 2 years ago
meta.sj at gmail.com
Fri Mar 16 01:26:29 UTC 2007
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Robert Horning wrote:
> And I believe you can get very meaningful contributions from many of
> these same individuals who certainly don't have a PhD. The difference
Is anyone disputing this? If so, that should be the subject of its own
Accountability should have nothing to do with confirming or verifying the
quality of contributions; it is just like a Real Names policy -- a
question of a community's standards for trust.
> credentials on most subjects by its primary contributors. And FA class
> articles would be on the statistical tail where I think you would be
> more likely to find educational credentials brought up in serious
When this comes up in serious discussions, does it carry weight?
I wouldg greatly appreciate references to where this carries weight on
More information about the foundation-l