[Foundation-l] (correction) Re: Notice of the results of the WMF Board of Trustees election

[Andrew Gray]

On 18/07/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's what I was getting at when I said the board would need to be
> expanded. By your numbers, we could only have a representative of the
> smaller projects by having 10 elected seats. That's not likely to
> happen. Having such representation would involve giving members of
> smaller projects more votes than larger ones, which isn't very "fair",
> and probably isn't in the foundation's best interest.

The top five, incidentally - enwp, dewp, frwp, jawp and plwp - account
for 75%; the second five for 15%!

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk