[Foundation-l] Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Casey Brown
cbrown1023 at comcast.net
Tue Jul 10 15:23:23 UTC 2007
This is actually an interesting idea. It's also ironic that you used the
same comparison as we did when rebutting ChapCom, how Philly is less like
Pittsburgh and more like Delaware and New York both.
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
daniwo59 at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:06 AM
To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Pennsylvania
In a message dated 7/10/2007 10:38:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
cbrown1023 at comcast.net writes:
Just for the record, we are doing State-based chapters at the request of
the
Chapters Committee. We had originally wanted a regional committee, but
ChapComm strongly suggested simply a state organization (and who were we to
argue? :P).
A couple of comments here. It seems to me that Philadelphia has more in
common with Trenton than it does with Pittsburgh. Newark, on the other hand,
or
Elizabeth, or wherever in northern NJ, has more in common with NYC. Chicago
and
Gary would make more sense than Chicago and Aurora. Etc. In a state driven
world, will DC, Potomac, and Alexandria be three separate chapters
(Washington
DC, Maryland, and Virginia respectively)? It would only be cool because you
could get to three different chapters using the same subway.
It seems to me that the US should consider metropolitan hubs as the basis
of
chapters. For an example of this, see how Craig's List operates.
Danny
************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list