[Foundation-l] Will the Board accept the election result?

Dan Rosenthal swatjester at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 20:36:26 UTC 2007


Rory is correct, that is exactly what I meant. I was pointing out  
that the rumors of it were probably based on GerardM's comments.

-Dan
On Jul 7, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Rory Stolzenberg wrote:

> On 7/7/07, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/07/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> No. It's likely based on GerardM's comments on his blog, here:  
>>> http://
>>> ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2007/07/who-cares-about-process.html in
>>> which he suggests that the board should repudiate the results if
>>> Danny is elected.
>>
>> LIKELY?
>>
>> ?????????????????
>>
>> I suppose this is why Wikipedia doesn't generally accept blogs as
>> 'reliable sources'?
>>
>> I could suggest that the Board do lots of things, but I don't see how
>> that makes it 'likely' that the Board will in fact do any of them.
>>
>> This seems a very weird suggestion to me.
>>
>> regards
>> Brianna
>> user:pfctdayelise
>
>
> I think he meant that this thread was likely based on that blog  
> post, not
> that what was said in the blog post was likely to actually happen.
>
> Rory
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




More information about the foundation-l mailing list