[Foundation-l] Will the Board accept the election result?

[George Herbert]

On 7/6/07, GerardM <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> From my perspective, Danny is not fit for a position as a board member. As
> he does not answer the question why it would be good for him to stand, there
> is no reason to think otherwise.

If you object to him being on the board, that's one thing; you are
free to campaign against him.  You and others have repeatedly raised
valid questions regarding Danny's past actions.

Arguing that he should not be allowed to stand for election in the
first place is... wrong.

Believing that you should be able to impose new arbitrary criteria for
fitness of people to stand for election to the board is .... wrong.

That's not what free elections are all about.  Please stop this insanity.


-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com