[Foundation-l] [Announcement] Welcome to the advisory group

[effe iets anders]

maybe it would be more constructive if we wouldnt stuck to this very person,
and the discussion whether he is notable or not have private? Then we could
maybe focus more on the issue that is imho more important, the *type* of
person that is missing. So not really names, but more the qualities that
lack this advisory group. Actually I am somehow missing a bit more input
from the communities. Most of the users seem to me (except angela) relative
outsiders, please correct me if i'm wrong. Might it be worth evaluating the
idea that in some way we should have a user of several parts of the
wikimedia communities? And then especially users who are more then just
users. So they should be active users, but also bring "a little extra", for
example, they combine that with skills on social, legal, economical or
ideological area.

Lodewijk

2007/1/29, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen op gmail.com>:
>
> Cormac Lawler schreef:
> > On 1/29/07, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen op gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ray Saintonge schreef:
> >>
> >>> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> There are many people who could make a valuable contribution to this
> >>>> advisory board. You apparently have yours and I do not even know
> Sunir
> >>>> Shah.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> He was at Wikimania in Frankfort.
> >>>
> >>> Ec
> >>>
> >> Hoi,
> >> So were you and I, so was Richard Stallman if that is what makes you
> >> notable ...
> >> Thanks,
> >>     GerardM
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Sunir Shah is the (co)founder of Meatball Wiki:
> > <http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?MeatballWiki> ;
> > <http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?SunirShah>. You can find his
> > Wikimania 2005 presentation details at:
> > <
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2005_Presentations#Other_Talks
> >.
> > I agree with Jussi-Ville that he could be of great service to the
> > advisory group.
> >
> > Cormac
> Hoi,
> I have again looked at the website, it gives me a chaotic impression. I
> have looked at the presentation it is OK, however I am sure that we have
> people of an equal calibre in our own ranks. My idea of an advisory
> board is that they have to bring something extra, something fresh. I
> fail to see what the extra is. To be blunt, to me is seems like a "blast
> from the past" while we need to see into a future and reach out.
> Thanks,
>     GerardM
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l op lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>