[Foundation-l] Proposal: Wikimedia Outreach

David Strauss david at fourkitchens.com
Sat Jan 6 19:41:55 UTC 2007

I'd love to turn what's currently FundCORE into an interactive portal
for coordinating community relations. It could provide the kind of
services and information for Wikimedians that don't fit well into a
wiki-based system like meta.wikimedia.org.

FundCORE is runs on Drupal, and Drupal has many community-engaging
modules to do things like managing community calendars, Wikimeets, etc.
SpreadFirefox is also Drupal-based.

Erik Moeller wrote:
> I'd like to propose the setup of a central, multilingual portal at
> outreach.wikimedia.org. Similar to efforts like spreadfirefox.com, the
> purpose of this portal would be to allow Wikimedians to come together
> and discuss ways to
> - inform the general public about Wikimedia projects
> - pursue more specific outreach efforts, such as schools, libraries and academia
> - maintain a list of speakers about Wikimedia-related topics
> - address concerns and questions
> - generally think of clever ideas for marketing and promotion.
> This portal, like spreadfirefox.com, would emphatically _not_ be aimed
> at the general public, but at Wikimedians eager to help raise
> awareness and spread ideas. We would make a whitelist of actions that
> can be performed without permission (such as offering to visit a
> school or university to talk about Wikipedia), and a process for
> requesting permissions when needed (such as broader use of the logo or
> trademarks).
> Requests for permissions would generally go to the ED for now, but
> we'd probably want to delegate this to the Marketing subcommittee if
> we deem it sufficiently functional. The chapters, in the long run,
> could perhaps also give permission for certain uses.
> I see a very strong role of the chapters when it comes to coordinating
> speakers for events, and other regional actions. While
> outreach.wikimedia.org would be a public database of such speakers
> where anyone can offer to talk, the chapters would maintain their own
> private database of speakers they trust. The interface for third
> parties to request a speaker would be, first and foremost, with the
> chapters, not with outreach.wikimedia.org.
> The advantage of this approach is that we get a large number of
> volunteers, but at the same time each chapter can come up with its own
> strategy to identify trusted individuals. Insofar as private databases
> are maintained for this, sharing code and data across chapters should
> of course be encouraged.
> Time for some Q&A:
> Q: What's a typical outreach effort exactly?
> One of the most important feats we must accomplish is getting
> traditional institutions of education to understand how our projects
> work, and how they can make responsible use of them. Visiting a school
> and giving a workshop about Wikipedia is an example.
> Q: Why not just use meta.wikimedia.org?
> A: Like we don't just use one wiki for educational content, I don't
> think it makes sense to have only one wiki for Wikimedia-related
> activities and information. Having a dedicated wiki allows us to
> promote this effort independently, to structure it in a more
> user-friendly way, to monitor changes more systematically, and so on.
> It makes it more likely that a dedicated community will arise
> specifically for Wikimedia Outreach.
> Q: Won't this just encourage random people to abuse our trademarks and
> do things in Wikimedia's name?
> A: Actually, hopefully it will accomplish the opposite: the
> development of a standard framework of pages and policies for people
> to pursue activities that are clearly beneficial to us. Things might
> be a bit chaotic initially, which is why we should make it clear
> (perhaps even in the sitenotice) that everything requires explicit
> permission from the ED for now.
> Q: What would be the relation between the marketing committee and this effort?
> A: In my view, committees are given explicit organizational authority
> to act with in their given scope. They are the source of "official"
> activities from the Foundation, and as such, they are highly
> restricted in terms of membership. But unless and until an effort is
> official, there is really no need for it to be limited to a committee.
> Q: I still don't see why we should open this up to the chaotic wiki
> process -- an organization is not a wiki!
> A: There are literally thousands of groups we want to work with in our
> global strategy to spread free knowledge. This cannot be handled by a
> small committee or the staff of a chapter; it needs the support of a
> global community of volunteers. If these volunteers are restrained
> clearly in their actions, and must pursue proper processes of
> authorization for certain projects, then hopefully, the activities
> that result from this will be well coordinated with chapters and the
> Foundation.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/attachments/20070106/286f84ea/attachment-0001.pgp 

More information about the foundation-l mailing list