[Foundation-l] A dangerous precedent

[hillgentleman]

Define spam.

Best,
H.

On 30/12/2007, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/12/2007, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > None of this is "cheating" because the method is not what's important.
> > The real important part is the collection and distribution of free
> > information. Stomping around and threatening some kind of fork or
> > whatever because you don't like the methods of another community to
> > achieve our goals is counterproductive.
>
>
> Indeed. The problem with the Volapuk Wikipedia as it stands is that
> this was *not* done to achieve our goals, but as a sort of spam. What
> was the reason for tolerating this again?
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>