[Foundation-l] Fwd: Wikimedia logos on Commons
Casey Brown
cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com
Sat Aug 25 20:32:52 UTC 2007
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike Godwin <mgodwin at wikimedia.org>
Date: Aug 25, 2007 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia logos on Commons
To: Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com>
Cc: Kat Walsh <mindspillage at gmail.com>
I should add that I'm all for making the logos available from some central
location for WMF and chapters to use. I just don't think they should be
lumped together with Commons -- that's a recipe for misunderstanding.
--m
On Aug 25, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Casey Brown wrote:
Some guy nommed all the WMF logos on Commons for deletion because they were
"not free" (Commons only accepts freely-licensed images). You can see the
full convo in the Foundation-l archvies.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com>
Date: Aug 25, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia logos on Commons
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Has anyone asked Mike's opinion on the discussion? Last I checked he was
working on trademarks (and probably logos too). I'm sure he'd find this
somewhat interesting.
On 8/25/07, Delirium <delirium at hackish.org> wrote:
>
> Brian wrote:
> > I think Erik really got to the heart of the issue. If this _were_ an
> issue,
> > it boils down to the fact that you need to have legal protection of
> certain
> > digital media that is somewhat stricter than your philosophy usually
> > permits, and finding a way to tackle that problem in all open source
> > projects is the place to do this, perhaps with a new type of license.
> >
>
> Well, the way the Debian project solved this is by [gasp!] just freely
> licensing their logo, as far as copyright goes, but retaining a
> trademark that they can use to prohibit misleading uses.
>
> (They do also have a "this logo is for official Debian use only" logo,
> but it's not the common one that is usually associated with the project.)
>
> See: http://www.debian.org/logos/
>
> IMO this is a much better way of handling it without inviting obvious
> discussions about consistency.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list