[Foundation-l] Language Review Committee
sabine_cretella at yahoo.it
Thu Apr 5 07:26:15 UTC 2007
Aagain I am posting the link to my blog - it seems as if just some very
few people read it - there is some experience behind all this. I posted
this already on the date it was written here.
Sorry, I am overloaded right now with work and cannot really take part
in this discussion:
Mark Williamson schrieb:
> That's what all the debate is about. Some people, such as Jeff and
> most of the people on the Langcom, seem to feel this is necessary.
> Others, such as myself, Arbeo, David Gerard, yourself (Robert) and
> several others seem to be having difficulty understanding why this is
> necessary for precisely the reasons you have outlined.
> Nobody seems to be making any new arguments.
> Suffice to say, from discussions I have had with people who had
> _formerly_ *approved* Wikipedias, they cannot understand why they are
> required to do this, many of them don't know what exactly it is that
> is required of them, and they are confused. It should be the
> responsibility of the LAnguage Committee, not of me, to explain to
> them what is happening here and give them a tutorial on how to edit
> the messages file and give them help dealing with the problems like
> the ones Fulup encountered.
> We need to be amicable and try to make this process easier for these
> people, not make it some sort of obstacle course.
More information about the foundation-l