[Foundation-l] Corporate vanity policy enforcement

[David Gerard]

On 29/09/06, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/29/06, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Yes. The problem is *not* one susceptible to a new rule, because the
> > problem is not the failure of present rules. The problem is keeping up
> > with the firehose of crap and not risking doing something really
> > stupid. Brad, this needs more thought than just adding another rule.

> Make it impossible to create orphan articles.


"Sorry, you can't have your article unless you apply *this* magic
trick we mention on a page you didn't read, did you."

Bites the newbies badly, and doesn't stop editors of bad faith for a
second. Rules can't cure malice.


- d.