[Foundation-l] Corporate vanity policy enforcement

geni geniice at gmail.com
Fri Sep 29 21:17:59 UTC 2006


On 9/29/06, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. The problem is *not* one susceptible to a new rule, because the
> problem is not the failure of present rules. The problem is keeping up
> with the firehose of crap and not risking doing something really
> stupid. Brad, this needs more thought than just adding another rule.

Make it impossible to create orphan articles.

-- 
geni



More information about the foundation-l mailing list