[Foundation-l] Verifiability: Constitution? Question for Jimbo!

[Walter van Kalken]

Andrew Lih wrote:

>On 9/17/06, Walter van Kalken <walter at vankalken.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>Andre Engels wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>2006/9/17, Christoph Seydl <Christoph.Seydl at students.jku.at>:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Jimbo Wales says: "I can NOT emphasize this enough.    There seems to be
>>>>a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative
>>>>'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs
>>>>a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be
>>>>sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of
>>>>negative information about living persons.    I think a fair number of
>>>>people need to be kicked out of the project just for being lousy
>>>>writers. (This is not a policy statement, just a statement of attitude
>>>>and frustration.)"
>>>>(http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046433.html)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>Dear Jimbo:
>>
>>I challenge you to find me a reference/citation for:
>>
>>''When walking on the major street towards increasing soi numbers, all
>>the even-numbered sois are on the right side and the odd-numbered ones
>>on the left side of the street. If for instance a new soi is added
>>between soi 7 and soi 9 it will get the number soi 7/1, the next one soi
>>7/2 etc. It is also possible that soi 20 is far away from soi 21 if
>>there are more sois on one side of the street than on the other.''
>>
>> From the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soi
>>    
>>
>
>Is this sufficient?
>http://www.frommers.com/destinations/bangkok/0071024195.html
>
>  
>
Interesting thanks.

Waerth