[Foundation-l] Logo Contests

Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Mon Sep 11 21:39:56 UTC 2006


Delphine Ménard wrote:
> On 9/11/06, Daniel Bregman <dbmag9 at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Following the Incubator logo debacle, I thought it pertinent to make sure
>> that the new logo contests are given the best possible chance of being
>> noticed. Hence this notice that there are currently three (3) logo
>> competitions open to voting at Meta.
>>
>> These are for Wikibooks, Wiktionary and Wikiversity. If you are an admin
>> there, please put up a sitenotice. If you are not, try to inform people in
>> those communities. If you are a member of the Foundation, please watch the
>> voting to make sure that inappropriate logos are not chosen.
>>     
>
>
> Thank you for the warning. I'll just say again what I've said a
> thousand times. What is it about the Wikimedia logo that is so grand
> that people seem to be stuck with it and its colors?
>
> Did imagination stop with the puzzleball? Are all those other projects
> not great enough that they deserve their very own identity?
>
> Mind you, there are a few very good logos out there. To keep on the
> safe side, I would by definition scratch anything that's remotely
> round, green, blue and red, or any of those two in the same logo.
>
> Delphine
> definitely puzzled.
Hoi,
It is not necessarily that the Wikipedia or the Meta or the Commons logo 
are that great. What they have is some common identity. I think it is a 
GOOD thing when the Wikimedia Foundation logos have familiarity. This 
does not mean that they have to be the seem but they having commonality 
is good.
Thanks,
     GerardM



More information about the foundation-l mailing list