[Foundation-l] Hi, Jimmy Wales, Is there inspectors to investigate admin

[valdelli at bluemail.ch]

IMHO we have a lot of helps, guidelines and so on... it is a good 
initiative but we should reduce them looking to integrate as soon as 
possible.

The community should have a small number and clair rules.

No rules is anarchy, more rules is burocracy... the risk is to have 
rules which try to solve the same problem but with contradictory 
solution.

Ilario

----Messaggio originale----
Da: dgerard at gmail.com
Data: 11.09.06 16.23
A: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"<foundation-l at wikimedia.org>
Oggetto: Re: [Foundation-l] Hi, Jimmy Wales,	Is there inspectors to 
investigate admins?

On 11/09/06, Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that forcing new customs or rules which comes from the 
"top"
> might create a natural opposision. I think the best place to put 
such
> a general "good customs" translations would be rather meta. Then 
it
> might be a good starting point how to slowly apply it to the all
> projects after duscussion within project's communities which 
should
> individally decide how to "customize" them to the nature and 
current
> rules of their projects.


I'm working on an essay about process in my en: userspace:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:
David_Gerard/Process_is_Dangerous

Process is there to help write an encyclopedia. Beyond that, it 
must
stay completely malleable. Important considerations are NPOV,
verifiability and no original research. For community maintenance,
assume good faith and no personal attacks; and don't bite the 
newbies,
since they seem to write most of the actual content, on en: at 
least.


- d.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l